Solar Panels Santa Clarita - High Power 175W Mono Solar Module (GP180MA) Supplied in China
- Loading Port:
- Shanghai
- Payment Terms:
- TT OR LC
- Min Order Qty:
- 1000 watt
- Supply Capability:
- 100000 watt/month
OKorder Service Pledge
OKorder Financial Service
You Might Also Like
Specification
Basic Info.
Model NO.: | GP-175P-72 | Material: | Monocrystalline Silicon |
Attribute (E. G.: Size): | Value (E. G.: 12 Inches) | Power: | 175W |
Export Markets: | Global | Trademark: | Gi-Power |
Packing: | Standard Export Packaging | Standard: | TUV; CE; ISO |
Origin: | Guangdong, China | HS Code: | 8541402000 |
Production Capacity: | 70mw/Year |
Product Description
200W/27V solar panel/module for solar power plant.
Quality Ensurance:
1. Excellent A Grade solar cell from Motech or Hanwha solar.
2. Excellent backsheet from SFC, 3M;
3. EVA from Bridgestone / First;
4. Junction box with UL and TUV listed - GZX, IP65;
5. High transmission low iron tempered glass from Xinyi Glass - China Top 1;
6. Solar panels with TUV, CE, ISO9001 certified.
Strong, lightweight aluminum frame design with reinforced sealing and load hold to prevent freezing and warping, and stand against high wind.
Under Standard Test Conditions(STC): Irradiance of 1000W/m2, Am1.5 and 25º C cell temperature
Operating Temperature: -40 ~ +85° C
Storage Temperature: -40 ~ +85° C
Mechanical Characteristics:
Dimensions: 1580mm (L) x808mm (W) x 45mm (H)
Weight: 16kg
Solar Cells: Monocrystalline 125*125 solar cells, 72cells in a 6x12matrix connected in series
Module Warranty:
Warranty on material and workmanship: Five years
Guaranteed output of 90% after 10 years and 80% after 25 years.
Performance | ||
Rated Power[Pmax] | 175W | |
Power Tolerance | ± 3% | |
Nominal Voltage | 36V | |
Design Life | 25 years | |
Electrical Characteristics | ||
Maximum Power [Pmax] | 175W± 3% | |
Maximum Power Voltage [Vmp] | 36.43V± 3% | |
Maximum Power Current [Imp] | 7.65A± 3% | |
Short-Circuit Current [Isc] | 8.23A± 3% | |
Open-Circuit Voltage [Voc] | 43.92V± 3% | |
Current Temperature Coefficient | 0.08%/º C | |
Voltage Temperature Coefficient | - 0.32%/º C | |
Power Temperature Coefficient | -0.38%/º C | |
Maximum System Voltage | 1000V |
Company Profile
Business Type: Manufacturer
Main Products: Solar Panel , Solar Module , PV Panel , PV Module , Poly Crystalline Solar Panel , Poly Crystalline Solar Module
Number of Employees: 202
Year of Establishment: 2009-03-26
Management System Certification: ISO 9001
OEM/ODM Availability: Yes
- Q: I am curious about how much of the energy that a solar panel of a given size and capacity will produce in it's lifetime, and what fraction of that energy was required to produce it in the first place?
- The attached link is to an article from the 200 Home Power magazine. In that article the energy payback was found to be between 2 and 4 years. Newer panels are more efficient primarily because the silicon wafers used today are thinner. The silicon cell embodies most of the energy required to make a solar panel. Today most solar panels will produce the amount of energy required to manufacture them in between about 9 months and 2 years depending upon the specific technology used to make it. Solar panels are expected to produce energy for between 30 and 50 years. Therefore it takes around 5% of their total energy production to produce them. Note that these figures depend upon where the panels are installed. Panels in very sunny areas may generate more than 3 times the energy of panels in a cloudier area. Edit - The energy payback meta-study that carbonates references below mention one particular study Alsema (2000), which the authors used as a baseline to come up with their 4 year payback figure. These studies DO NOT assume ideal conditions. The Alsema study assumes an annual an irradiation of 700 kWh/m2/yr. That is the United States average irradiation and does take into account cloudy weather and the like. Under idea conditions the amount of energy collected can be almost twice as much. Albuquerque New Mexico is an example. The figures I mentioned above are recent values reported by several different panel manufacturers with whom I discussed the issue at the 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion held this May. The very long payback times that carbonate highlights are almost certainly wrong. The study he references concludes that paybacks range between 2 and 8 years with 4 years being the most likely. In my opinion payback times are actually a fair bit shorter based on conversations with the manufacturers.
- Q: How much money can you save by using solar panels?
- The amount of money you can save by using solar panels depends on various factors such as your energy consumption, the size of your solar panel system, and the cost of electricity in your area. On average, homeowners can save anywhere from 40% to 70% on their electricity bills by switching to solar panels. However, it's important to consult with a solar energy professional to get an accurate estimate based on your specific circumstances.
- Q: Can solar panels be installed on a pergola or shade structure?
- Yes, solar panels can be installed on a pergola or shade structure. However, it is important to ensure that the structure is sturdy enough to support the weight of the panels and that they are properly angled to receive maximum sunlight. Additionally, the design and installation should be done by professionals to ensure safety and optimal performance.
- Q: Hi, I am starting to get curious about the pros/cons of installing solar panels - has anyone done it and is it worth it?
- In the state of Pennsylvania in the USA, a very basic 5KW solar installation will cost you $35,000. Of that you will recover approximately $28,000 over the next five (5) years between the State and the Feds. Making your net-cost something between $7,000 and $9,000 depending on various factors. All other things being equal in a standard household with fuel-based heat and window units vs. central AC, this system will provide roughly 50% of power required with a payback of approximately eight (8) years (with electricity at $0.4/kwh). The system has an estimated forty (40) year service life. Without _all_ the subsidies, the payback is longer than the estimated system life, especially if you consider the time-value of money. The life-cycle cost of a photo-voltaic array is horrendous. By that, I mean the total cost of producing the panels, installing them, and then removing them and disposing of them in an environmentally correct manner. All that added in and there is a negative payback. So, it all depends on what one defines as worth it. Putting the cost onto taxpayers via governmental subsidy to make an otherwise wretchedly expensive process viable may give you all sorts of warm-and-fuzzy feelings about renewable resources and reducing dependence on foreign oil and so forth. But the reality is that the true cost of solar panels exceeds that of nuclear power per KW delivered. Even today when nuclear plants start in the Billions-with-a-B in any currency you would care to name.
- Q: The average solar panel produces 0% of the energy that is put into it. What is happening to the other 90%? Is it being reflected or is it being obsorbed by materials that are not a part of the solar cell? Is it possible to one day have near 00% efficient solar cell technology?
- Sunlight comes in many frequencies, that's why it's white. Solar Photovoltaics require a photon to displace an electron from a semiconductor and that only happens at one frequency depending on what the semiconductor material is, therefore only one exact frequency gets turned into power. They are working on using organic dyes or quantum dots to absorb the energy in different frequencies and re-emit the energy in the desired frequency. They also are working on using multiple semiconductor materials to try and capture more frequencies. The rest of the energy becomes heat which also reduces the efficiency of the solar cells. The lab record for solar photovoltaics is 42.8% efficiency and quantum dots promises to be 65% to 75% efficient. Keep in mind that fossil fuels are based on energy collected by photosynthesis over millions of years. The efficiency of photosynthesis with modern plants is about 0.5% and the theoretical maximum efficiency of photosynthesis is 6.6%. All of our current energy use is based upon a small fraction of 0.5% efficiency over millions of years.
- Q: Can any body tell me how much Electricity can 0 Standard solar panels produce in a day( in terms of Watts)Or else please tell me how many Watts is 5 volts of electricity?
- I am sure someone can tall you.
- Q: I have a home made 24 volt electric cart. It is powered by two 2Volt deep cycle batteries. Since the motor runs on 24 volts the batteries are wired in series to produce the 24 volts. I only have a 2 volt battery charger, but I also have two 2 volt solar panels. It is a pain having to unhook wires, rewire it, or charge them one at the time.HERE IS THE QUESTION REALLY... Can I wire the two 2 volt solar panels together in series (ie: negative to positive) then connect it to the existing 24 volt system and have it charge the batteries fine. I know basic wiring, but I know nearly nothing about solar panels, will it work fine? will it cause them to break? or short out?(additional info, the solar panels are only rated at 5 amps so it will not overcharge the batteries or anything)
- Although I'm not experienced with solar panels, I would say no. if you wire them in series you'll actually be putting voltage through one of the panels. Can't believe this would be good. My suggestion would be to wire one panel to one battery and one panel to the other battery. I really don't believe there's a need to disconnect the batteries from each other. However if you would disconnect the one wire between the two batteries you would be guaranteed safe and I know that would work.
- Q: I've been thinking and I'd like to have solar panels installed on my roof at some point to help reduce our electricity consumption- but I live in IL and in the winter it frequently snows. Is there such a thing as heated solar panels so they don't get coated w/ice or snow? Are solar panels even a feasible option in IL? Thank you, Anna
- With state incentives that rank behind only a few states (such as the ones typically associated with solar like Florida and California) somebody definitely thinks solar is right for Illinois. (source is first site below) As for the ice and snow the typical strategy is to have a tilt that allows for only limited accumulation and still has good orientation to the sun. This is frequently talked about in articles in the magazines Homepower and Solar today. Homepower has a site online and some items are free (2nd site) Good Luck
- Q: Can solar panels be used to power a disaster relief operation?
- Yes, solar panels can be used to power a disaster relief operation. They provide a reliable and renewable source of energy, which can be harnessed to power various essential operations such as communication systems, medical equipment, lighting, and water purification systems. Solar panels are particularly useful in disaster-stricken areas where conventional power sources might be disrupted or unavailable. They are portable, easy to set up, and can provide a sustainable energy solution during critical situations.
- Q: So I reckon it's time to install some of these bad boys. it's come to point where electricity providers are charging such extortionate amounts that I can definitely see these reaping huge rewards before long. (Okay I might be exaggerating a little - they are pretty costly themselves).The problem is I've read around that they're only fitted to south facing houses? Why so? Why can't they be installed on the rear side of the roof - the side facing the garden? My house is facing north, so the front door leads north. Could I have solar panels installed on the back? (That's basically my question, with a bit of a rant too lol).Cheers.
- You want the panels facing south because that is where they would get the most sunlight throughout the day. If your front door is facing north, then the back of your house would be facing south, right? So put them up in the back where they are facing south...haha wtf..
Send your message to us
Solar Panels Santa Clarita - High Power 175W Mono Solar Module (GP180MA) Supplied in China
- Loading Port:
- Shanghai
- Payment Terms:
- TT OR LC
- Min Order Qty:
- 1000 watt
- Supply Capability:
- 100000 watt/month
OKorder Service Pledge
OKorder Financial Service
Similar products
Hot products
Hot Searches
Related keywords